Quality of life in schizophrenia: A multicenter, randomized, naturalistic, controlled trial comparing olanzapine to first-generation antipsychotics

Quality of life in schizophrenia: A multicenter, randomized, naturalistic, controlled trial comparing olanzapine to first-generation antipsychotics

Author Lima, M. S. de Google Scholar
Mari, Jair de Jesus Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Breier, A. Google Scholar
Costa, A. M. Google Scholar
Sena, E. P. de Google Scholar
Hotopf, M. Google Scholar
Institution Univ Fed Pelotas
Eli Lilly & Co
Univ Catolica Pelotas
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med
Kings Coll London
Abstract Objective: To assess the effectiveness of olanzapine for treating schizophrenia and to assess if olanzapine promotes a better quality of life than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs).Method: Multicenter, naturalistic, randomized controlled study, comparing olanzapine with FGAs. at hospitalization and during a 9-month follow-up. Outcome assessors were blind to the allocated drug. The dose of antipsychotic was determined by doctors according to their clinical practice routines. Data collection was performed from April 1999 to August 2001.Results: 197 patients with DSM-IV-diagnosed schizophrenia were allocated to olanzapine (N = 104) and FGA (N = 93). Patients taking olanzapine showed greater improvements in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative symptoms (mean difference = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) and general psychopathology (mean difference = 4.0, 95% Cl = 0.8 to 7.2) subscales and fewer incidences of tardive dyskinesia (RR = 2.4. 95% Cl = 1.4 to 4.2, p <.0001). Olanzapine was also associated with greater improvement in a number of health-related quality-of-life outcomes on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, including physical functioning (mean difference = 6.6, 95% Cl = 1.2 to 11.9), physical role limitations (mean difference = 13.7, 95% Cl = 3.0 to 24.3), and emotional role limitations (mean difference = 12.1, 95% CI = 0.7 to 23.5). Patients taking olanzapine gained significantly more weight during the trial than patients taking FGAs, with a correspondent endpoint increase in the body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 versus 25.3 (p <.001).Conclusion: Compared with FGAs, olanzapine has advantages in terms of improvements of negative symptoms and quality of life. It is also associated with fewer incidences of tardive dyskinesia and greater increases in weight and BMI. These findings are highlighted by the naturalistic approach adopted in this trial.
Language English
Date 2005-07-01
Published in Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry. Memphis: Physicians Postgraduate Press, v. 66, n. 7, p. 831-838, 2005.
ISSN 0160-6689 (Sherpa/Romeo, impact factor)
Publisher Physicians Postgraduate Press
Extent 831-838
Origin http://www.psychiatrist.com/jcp/article/Pages/2005/v66n07/v66n0704.aspx
Access rights Closed access
Type Article
Web of Science ID WOS:000230663800004
URI http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44330

Show full item record




File

File Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account